原文标题：Asia should seize opportunity to lead global trade
中文摘要：亚洲开发银行专家Ganeshan Wignaraja和Juzhong Zhuang在《亚洲应抓住机遇引领全球贸易》一文中表示，西方国家保护主义情绪的上升以及2011年以来全球贸易的剧烈下滑使很多人推测亚洲出口导向型增长的时代即将结束。但这一推测有些言过其实。虽然有必要对贸易放缓采取措施，但亚洲本身已经做好了成为反对保护主义壁垒的准备。事实上，亚洲可以在未来引领全球贸易。为了抓住发展机遇，亚洲国家需要继续实施结构性改革，提高技术，并加强中小企业的金融能力。政策制定者应该抵制保护主义压力，尽可能降低进口关税，使商品和服务得以自由流通。诸如区域全面经济伙伴协定的大型贸易协议有助于服务市场的准入并可以促进良好管理实践的传播。亚洲从近年来的贸易中获益匪浅，应继续实施能够使亚洲在全球贸易中发挥引领作用的相关政策。（编译：罗婧婧）
Rising protectionist sentiment in the West and a dramatic decline in global trade since 2011 have led many to speculate that Asia’s era of export-led growth will end soon. This speculation is overdone. While the slowdown in trade does demand responses, Asia is well positioned to be a bulwark against protectionism. In fact, it can lead global trade in the years to come.
But, getting the responses right will require a clear understanding of the causes. Policy makers need to ask first what explains the export slowdown, and what this means for Asian economies. The story starts with the great recession in 2008, which left advanced countries stuck in low growth, low demand environments that have weighed heavily on Asia’s export-dominated economies.
In recent years, the problems of developed world economies have become entangled with the People's Republic of China (PRC)’s structural transformation, which has meant slower growth for Asia’s largest economy. Two trends accompanying China’s structural transformation have implications for Asian trade. One is its shift away from an export and investment-driven growth model toward domestic consumption and services. The other is China’s moving up the global value chain as wages rise.
These trends have reduced demand for imports from the rest of Asia. Fueled by expanding middle class consumers, the PRC continues to import consumables from across Asia. But, imports of capital goods and raw materials have declined. Accordingly, the annual average growth of the PRC’s total imports from developing Asia fell from 18.2% in 2001-2010 to 4.7% in 2011-2015.
They have also reduced trade in parts and components, which contain higher value addition than simply assembling products. The ratio of the PRC’s intermediate goods imports to manufactured exports fell from 63% to about 38% between 2000 and 2015.
The good news is that these factors are either temporary, such as weak import demand from advanced markets, or can be overcome through smart policymaking that takes advantage of the region’s strengths.
Here are three ways Asia can take the lead in global trade.
First, the PRC’s economic rebalancing and moving up global value chains (GVCs) is opening up new trading opportunities for the PRC itself. The PRC’s production data confirm that the country is following the model of higher value added and building innovation capability seen first in Japan and subsequently in the Republic of Korea.
This implies the development of more technologically sophisticated regional value chains and related services in East Asia that can propel a new phase of regional and global trade growth. The spread of robotics, advances in miniaturisation, developments in internet connectivity, process-centered research and development, and various organisational innovations are increasingly likely to feature in GVCs in this new phase of trade growth.
Second, many developing economies are well positioned to benefit from the PRC’s rebalancing. Bangladesh, India, Viet Nam and other members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) face the prospect of replacing the PRC in labor-intensive segments of GVCs, from clothing to consumer electronics. These Asian economies are increasingly open to export-oriented foreign direct investment and offer relatively low wages with reasonably good labor productivity.
Third, trade in services offers a new opportunity for many middle income countries in the region. Services constitute the largest sector in most economies in developing Asia, but they are rarely traded because of trade restrictions, skills gaps, and problems with internet connectivity.
Digital trade, professional and financial services, and GVC-related services are areas with potential for trade growth. Both the PRC and India are likely to further expand their roles as exporters and importers of services. ASEAN and South Asian economies have opportunities to further develop tourism, including from markets in other regional economies, and other commercial services exports.
To capitalise on these opportunities, it is important that Asian countries continue to implement structural reform to upgrade skills, enhance finance for small and medium-sized enterprises, invest in seaports and other trade-related and digital infrastructure and reduce behind-the-border barriers such as cumbersome local government regulationsand labor laws.
Policy makers should resist protectionist pressures. Instead, they should liberalize goods and services trade by reducing import tariffs where possible and instituting better surveillance of non-tariff measures. The World Trade Organization’s Trade Facilitation Agreement, which 19 economies in developing Asia have ratified to date, promises to reduce the region’s trade costs.
Large trade agreements such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership can help generate market access for services and spread good regulatory practices. Asia has benefited greatly from trade in recent years. It should continue to implement the kinds of policies that will make it the leader in global trade.